Israel's trajectory in the international arena is increasingly characterised by a flagrant disregard for the principles of state sovereignty, international law, and human rights, which are the bedrock of global order. This contentious stance underscores a deep-seated unilateralism that challenges the very fabric of international diplomacy and law, propelling Israel toward an unwelcome designation as a rogue state.
Israel’s frequent military incursions into neighbouring territories represent a systematic breach of the most fundamental norms of state sovereignty. Its historical and ongoing aerial strikes and ground operations in sovereign nations such as Yemen, Syria, Lebanon, and Iran, ostensibly under the banner of preemptive self-defence, starkly contravene the United Nations Charter. Such actions not only undermine regional stability but also erode the norms that govern state interactions, setting a perilous precedent.
At the heart of Israel's rogue state narrative is its protracted conflict with the Palestinians, which serves as a glaring exemplar of its contempt for international norms. The continued expansion of settlements in the West Bank, universally censured and declared illegal under international law, is emblematic of Israel’s imperialistic tendencies. These settlements are not merely infractions of international statutes; they are aggressive acts that dispossess Palestinians, disrupt their contiguity, and dilute their sovereignty, all while the spectre of annexation looms large.
Israel’s policy framework in the occupied territories is an archetypal study of the systemic violation of human rights under the guise of security. Actions such as extrajudicial killings, arbitrary detentions, and punitive demolitions are documented with alarming regularity by myriad human rights organizations. Furthermore, the starvation and aggression against the people of Gaza have been denounced as a form of genocide and collective punishment, a stark violation of both humanitarian norms and international law.
About 19 days ago, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) issued an advisory opinion declaring Israel's occupation of Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem as illegal. This judgment was a response to a request by the UN General Assembly, which asked for clarification on the legal consequences of Israel's actions in the Occupied Palestinian Territory.
The ICJ's decision highlighted the violation of established norms against annexation, settlements, racial segregation, and apartheid, noting that the opinion is both declarative and legally binding for Israel and any state endorsing the occupation. The experts also criticised the longstanding approach that Palestinian self-determination should only come through direct negotiations with Israel, pointing out that this has led to persistent violence, dispossession, and rights abuses against Palestinians for over 30 years.
The court made clear that the rights to self-determination and freedom from occupation and apartheid are unequivocal and non-negotiable. The ruling addressed actions such as the demolition of homes, refusal to grant housing permits, and land confiscation, noting these as attempts by Israel to transform its occupation into annexation, in direct violation of international laws against using force for territorial annexation.
This opinion is viewed as vital for reinforcing international law, especially as the ICJ also reviews claims of Israel's violations of the Genocide Convention. This follows an advisory opinion that was issued 20 years ago about the illegality of Israel's construction of a barrier in the Occupied Territories, which was largely ignored by Israel and other UN Member States, perpetuating a cycle of impunity.
Since the recent ruling, Israel has escalated its attacks on civilians and resources in Gaza. The experts have called for Israel to adhere to this and other ICJ decisions, emphasizing that Israel must end its disregard for international law. They advocated for a reevaluation of all diplomatic, political, and economic relationships with Israel, suggesting actions such as arms embargoes and targeted sanctions.
Despite forging new alliances and normalising relations with certain nations, Israel's international image has been severely tarnished by its actions, which paint it as a pariah in numerous global forums. Its habitual vetoing by allied nations does little to mitigate the view of its status as a rogue state; rather, it highlights the dichotomies in global governance and the often politicized nature of international law.
For Israel to retract from the precipice of rogue state status, an overhaul of its approach to international engagement is imperative. This entails a rigorous adherence to international law, starting with a cessation of territorial expansions and a genuine commitment to a viable two-state solution with Palestine. Only through such transformative actions can Israel hope to restore its standing in the international community and foster long-term regional peace.
The narrative of Israel as a rogue state is neither hyperbolic nor unwarranted but a critical reflection of its policies and actions that flout international norms. The implications of such behaviour are profound, not only for regional stability but for the integrity of international law itself. As Israel continues to navigate its complex geopolitical landscape, the international community must remain vigilant and uncompromising in its demand for adherence to the principles that preserve peace and justice worldwide. The path forward requires a fundamental reevaluation of priorities, ensuring that respect for human rights and international law takes precedence over unilateral measures justified under the nebulous umbrella of national security.
Oman Observer is now on the WhatsApp channel. Click here
