There is a thought-provoking saying about balancing work, income, and progress that states, “there is no taxation without representation.”
Estonia, a nation with a similar population to the Sultanate of Oman and global leader in the digital economy offers an excellent success story with around 97 per cent tax compliance.
This success story, which I witnessed first hand with fellow National Leadership and Competitiveness Program (NLCP) colleagues as a part of Oxford University’s Said Business School Programme, would not have been possible without the innovative fairness and transparency of Estonian tax authorities.
A successful tax system shows taxpayers publicly accessible platform dashboards where all the public services that their money funds. We can witness an even better success story here in the Sultanate of Oman by alignment with 'Oman Vision 2040' pillars, therefore embracing fairness and transparency in applying the upcoming Personal Income Tax, currently under discussion by the Majlis Ash'Ashura.
One of the most insightful and beneficial ways to look at the long term impact of taxes on the society is revisiting the views of esteemed socio-economic scholars, such as the founder of the socio-economic studies, known in Arabic as Alomran, AbdulRahman Ibn Khaldun (1332-1406 AD).
It is also beneficial to revisit the advantages and disadvantages of personal income taxes, alongside examining both local and global best practices.
The impact of imposing taxes without meaningful representation
Taxation without meaningful representation has historically led to significant negative consequences. This concept, which means imposing taxes on a population without their direct, fair and transparent participation or consent in the decision-making process, has sparked significant historical events. The American Revolution, for instance, was largely driven by British colonists’ frustration with being taxed by a parliament in which they had no representatives.
Similarly, the French Revolution saw the common people burdened with taxes while the nobility and clergy were largely exempt, leading to widespread unrest and eventual upheaval. These examples illustrate how crucial representation is in ensuring fair and effective taxation systems.
What does Ibn Khaldun say about taxes and productivity?
Ibn Khaldun, the renowned 14th-century historian and sociologist, provides insightful perspectives on taxation. He argued that excessive taxation can discourage economic activity, leading to a decline in overall productivity, competitiveness and state revenue.
According to Ibn Khaldun, moderate and fair taxation is essential for encouraging trade, industry, and agriculture. High tax rates, he believed, reduce the incentive for individuals and businesses to work and invest, ultimately harming the economy.
This principle remains relevant today, suggesting that careful consideration is necessary when designing tax policies to avoid stifling economic growth.
Advantages of Personal Income Tax
Personal income taxes, when implemented effectively, can offer significant advantages. They are a major source of revenue for governments, enabling the funding of essential public services such as healthcare, education, and infrastructure.
A progressive income tax system, where higher earners pay a larger percentage of their income, can help reduce income inequality and provide a more equitable distribution of resources.
Additionally, personal income taxes can act as automatic stabilisers during economic downturns, as tax revenues decrease when incomes fall, helping to mitigate the impact of economic recessions.
Disadvantages of Personal Income Tax
However, there are also notable disadvantages to personal income taxes. Collecting these taxes requires substantial administrative efforts, including filing, processing, and auditing, which can be costly and time-consuming. Individuals and businesses may face high compliance costs, including time spent on tax preparation and money spent on professional services.
High personal income tax rates can also discourage work, savings, and investment, potentially slowing economic growth and reducing overall productivity. Furthermore, higher tax rates can incentivize tax evasion and avoidance, leading to a loss of revenue and an unfair burden on compliant taxpayers.
Best Practices
Successful examples of personal income tax systems around the world provide valuable lessons. In countries like the United States, Germany, Sweden, Canada, Australia, and the United Kingdom, progressive income tax systems fund a wide range of public services and social welfare programmes. These countries have managed to balance the need for revenue generation with economic competitiveness by implementing fair and efficient tax systems. These examples show that while personal income taxes can support robust public services and social safety nets, careful design and implementation are crucial to maintaining economic vitality and competitiveness.
In conclusion, increasing taxes, particularly personal income taxes, can have significant implications for our economic competitiveness. While they are essential for funding public services and promoting social equity, excessive taxation can discourage economic activity and reduce overall productivity. Historical examples and insights from scholars like Ibn Khaldun highlight the importance of fair, transparent and moderate taxation.
Examining successful tax systems globally provides valuable lessons on balancing the need for revenue with maintaining a competitive economy.
As Oman considers implementing personal income tax, these insights underscore the importance of careful and thoughtful tax policy design to ensure sustainable economic growth and competitiveness.
Oman Observer is now on the WhatsApp channel. Click here
