Opinion

AI hype fades as crypto regulation advances

STEFANO VIRGILLI stefano@virgilli.com The author is a member of the International Press Association.
 
STEFANO VIRGILLI stefano@virgilli.com The author is a member of the International Press Association.
Global stock markets have faced significant challenges in the past two weeks, driven by concerns over escalating interest rates and the looming threat of an economic slowdown. This turbulence has been particularly evident in the technology sector, where investor sentiment has taken a hit, leading to a noticeable pullback.

Artificial intelligence (AI) continues to dominate the investment landscape, but recent filings reveal a surprising trend: Wall Street's billionaire investors are steadily selling off shares of Nvidia, the leading AI hardware provider. Despite the company's massive gains this year, fueled by demand for its AI-powered GPUs, a growing number of prominent money managers are trimming their stakes, raising concerns about the sustainability of Nvidia's meteoric rise.

Nvidia's exceptional performance in 2023 is undeniable. The company's stock price has skyrocketed by 709 per cent, translating to a market cap increase of over $2.5 trillion. This remarkable growth is attributed to the surging demand for its data-center hardware, particularly the H100 GPU, which has become the cornerstone of generative AI solutions and large language models. With Nvidia holding a near-monopoly in the AI GPU market, the company has been able to command premium pricing, significantly boosting its profit margins.

However, the latest round of 13F filings paints a different picture. Seven prominent billionaire asset managers, including Ken Griffin of Citadel Advisors and David Tepper of Appaloosa, reduced their Nvidia holdings during the June-ended quarter. This trend of selling continues a pattern observed in previous quarters, raising questions about the underlying reasons behind this exodus.

Several factors could explain this shift in investor sentiment. Historical trends suggest that early-stage bubbles are common in next-big-thing technologies. With businesses still figuring out how to monetize their AI investments, the AI boom could be the next bubble waiting to burst. If this occurs, Nvidia, as the leading AI hardware provider, could face significant repercussions.

Although Nvidia currently dominates the AI GPU market, increased competition looms on the horizon. Several external competitors are entering the market with their own AI-GPUs. Additionally, some of Nvidia's largest customers are developing their own AI chips in-house, potentially reducing their reliance on Nvidia's hardware.

US export restrictions on high-powered AI chips to China could also significantly impact Nvidia's revenue. These restrictions could cost Nvidia billions of dollars in sales.

Further adding to the concerns, Nvidia's own executives and board members haven't purchased company stock on the open market since December 2020. CEO Jensen Huang has even been selling his shares recently. This lack of insider buying suggests a lack of confidence in the company's future prospects.

Finally, while Nvidia's forward price-to-earnings ratio may seem reasonable, its trailing-12-month price-to-sales ratio reached alarming levels in June, comparable to the peaks observed in companies like Cisco Systems and Amazon before the dot-com bubble burst. This raises concerns about the sustainability of Nvidia's current valuation.

In contrast to the cooling sentiment around AI, the cryptocurrency market, although experiencing its share of volatility, is witnessing a strengthening of its foundations. Governments worldwide are increasingly recognizing the legitimacy and potential of digital assets, paving the way for greater integration into the global economy.

A landmark ruling in Dubai, recognizing cryptocurrency as a legitimate form of salary payment, is a prime example of this trend. This ruling, in case number 1739 of 2024, overturned a previous decision from 2023 and highlights a growing recognition of the evolving financial landscape within the Web3 economy.

The case revolved around an employee whose contract stipulated a monthly salary in both fiat currency and EcoWatt tokens. The employer's failure to pay the token portion of the salary for six months led to the legal dispute. In the initial ruling, the court acknowledged the inclusion of tokens in the contract but did not enforce payment, citing a lack of a clear method for valuing the cryptocurrency in fiat terms.

However, the court's stance changed in 2024, ruling in favor of the employee and ordering the payment of the crypto salary as per the contract, without conversion to fiat. This decision, according to UAE lawyer Irina Heaver, showcases a 'progressive approach' towards integrating digital currencies into the country's legal and economic framework.